As a Committed Capitalist, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Top Solution for American Health System

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare it to what average US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses that are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.

Ms. Emily Craig
Ms. Emily Craig

A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in online casino strategy and player psychology.