🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, delayed for at least 12 months after the law is enacted.

The WHO actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which enable stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support developing rules to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.